All presentations

Pardon my code mix: Hypostatic frame constructions in Czech

Slide 1: Pardon my code mix: Hypostatic frame constructions in Czech

Pardon my code mix: Hypostatic frame constructions in Czech

Dominik Lukeš

[email protected]

MetaphorHacker.net

@TechCzech

Original slide 1 (image)

Slide 2: A speculative inquiry into the nature of constructions with examples from Czech morphology in communicative context.

A speculative inquiry into the nature of constructions with examples from Czech morphology in communicative context.

Original slide 2 (image)

Slide 3: Slide 3

  1. Constructional treatment of text-level phenomena
  2. Mental representations of schematic forms
  3. Hypostatic code switching

Original slide 3 (image)

Slide 4: Case of the Czech “hypostatic frame construction”?

Case of the Czech “hypostatic frame construction”?

Original slide 4 (image)

Slide 5: Assumptions about code-switching / Code mixing

Assumptions about code-switching / Code mixing

Original slide 5 (image)

Slide 6: Slide 6

Code switching can apply to any systematic variation even in a ‘monolingual’ context.

There is a continuum between code switching and mixing (as well as borrowing).

There is a continuum of speakers’ conscious control over the process.

Original slide 6 (image)

Slide 7: Hypostatic code-switching

Hypostatic code-switching

Original slide 7 (image)

Slide 8: Slide 8

Often code-switching is ‘turned on’ in the conversation by some lexical / morphological means or signalled in another way.

Original slide 8 (image)

Slide 9: Slide 9

And then Fred said unto Karen.

Panenka s červenejma šatičkami.

Underline in the source slide, kept apart from the bold and italic shown above (the slide underlines these spans; this text has no underline mark): ejma in červenejma.

Original slide 9 (image)

Slide 10: Slide 10

  • “Pardon my French”
  • “That’s what she said” jokes
  • Intonation
  • Characterisation in narrative

Original slide 10 (image)

Slide 11: Code switching research has a tradition in Czech studies going back to at least the 1980s

Code switching research has a tradition in Czech studies going back to at least the 1980s

Original slide 11 (image)

Slide 12: Slide 12

“The features which are marked as "bookish”, i.e. those which are usually found in the written form of the literary language, are often used in the colloquial language in an ironic way in order to foreground the particular idea or ideas which they express.”

— (Hammer, 1985)

Original slide 12 (image)

Slide 13: Slide 13

“[Common Czech] (especially in a specific combination with bookish means) often serves to the aims of irony.”

— Sgall, et al. (1992) Variation in language: Code switching in Czech as a challenge for sociolinguistics

Original slide 13 (image)

Slide 14: Slide 14

“V některých rozhlasových a televizních pořadech se užívá OČ, aby se vytvořila „intimní“ atmosféra mezi moderátorem a hosty. I tato tendence se ne vždy setkává s nadšením veřejnosti”

“Colloquial Czech is often used in radio and TV shows to create an “intimate” atmosphere between show host and guests. This trend is not always enthusiastically received by the public.”

— (N. Bermel, 2010)

Original slide 14 (image)

Slide 15: Czech “diglossia”

Czech “diglossia”

  • Standard - Spisovná
    • Written, formal, high register
    • Lexicon: dům, déle
    • Morphology: velký dům
    • Phonology: oko
  • Non-Standard – Nespisovná
    • Spoken, informal, low register
    • Lexicon: barák, dýl
    • Morphology: velkej barák
    • Phonology: voko

Underline in the source slide, kept apart from the bold and italic shown above (the slide underlines these spans; this text has no underline mark): in the Non-Standard column, barák and dýl (Lexicon), ej in velkej and barák (Morphology), v in voko (Phonology).

Original slide 15 (image)

Slide 16: Adjectival declension, Sig, Masc

Adjectival declension, Sig, Masc

Nom-ý-ej
Gen-ého-ýho
Dat-ému-ýmu
Acc-ý-ej
Loc-ým-ym
Inst-ým-ym

Original slide 16 (image)

Slide 17: In a Czech group discussing a project in a professional context. Switching is often not hypostesized but…

In a Czech group discussing a project in a professional context. Switching is often not hypostesized but…

Original slide 17 (image)

Slide 18: Slide 18

(2) teda bez koktání / bez takovýho hláskování / vona čte po slabikách /jo / … / tak tam je psáno jenom velkými písmeny / no / a vona si je schopna ty dvě tři stránky přečíst // sama //

Louise Hammer (1985)

Underline in the source slide, kept apart from the bold and italic shown above (the slide underlines these spans; this text has no underline mark): teda; ýho in takovýho; v in the first vona; jo; jenom (also italic); v in the second vona; si.

Original slide 18 (image)

Slide 19: Slide 19

…ale tó se dovíme ’až / po tom desátym řekneme / na dnes / já sem vás vobcházel jednotlivě / na dnes sem chtěl / abyste se podívali všichni / na ty / ’alternativy / ’a připravili si přístup ’a případně kritéria jednotlivá / na to hodnocení / s tím / že já předpokládám že do konce ledna byzme to měli mít hotový ’abych to mohl dát přeložit ’a toho desátého ’aby to vodešlo / vycházím z předpokladu že / hodnocení bude zase v technické a v obchodní části / že se to týká / pokud se týká té technické části / teda těch technickejch charakteristik pardon v technické oblasti / se to týká technickejch charakteristik bezpečnosti / paliva / ’organizačních ’aspektů / no ’a v té obchodní tam je více méně jasný…

Bogoczová et al. (2000)

Underline in the source slide, kept apart from the bold and italic shown above (the slide underlines these spans; this text has no underline mark): ym in desátym; v in vobcházel; ty (in “na ty”); to (in “na to hodnocení”); ý in hotový; v in vodešlo; ejch in technickejch (both times); ý in jasný.

Original slide 19 (image)

Slide 20: Code switching signal into project language:

Code switching signal into project language:

  • podle pana
  • jak tomu říká …
  • jak se píše v tom
  • tak zvaný
  • abych to tak řekl(a)
  • jak tomu tady říkáme
  • DET
  • word choice
  • intonation

Original slide 20 (image)

Slide 21: Code switching signal from project language:

Code switching signal from project language:

  • jak se říká
  • jestli to tak mohu říct
  • já jsem x, tak...
  • jak se lidově říká
  • jak já vždycky říkám
  • hezky česky
  • sprostonárodně
  • DET
  • Intonation

Original slide 21 (image)

Slide 22: Code switching in informal conversations

Code switching in informal conversations

Oral v1, 6 mil, conversational spoken corpus, 2017

https://kontext.korpus.cz

Original slide 22 (image)

Slide 23: Slide 23

jo to právě ty přijedeš na technickou a on ti zkontroluje číslo motoru a číslo karosérie , napíše to zkontroluje to s techničákem a vydá ti papír na kterym je pouze napsáno že prostě evidenční prohlídka a že čísla karosérie a motoru odpovídaj technickému průkazu , a voni potom podle tohodle papíru na @ na tom dopravnim inspektorátu sou sou si jistý že to auto máš s těma číslama který máš a že tam nemáš vyměněnej motor nebo že nemáš vyměněnou karoserii a protože voni to nejdou zkontrolovat že jo voni to tam pouze zapapírujou a tim to pro ně

Underline in the source slide, kept apart from the bold and italic shown above (the slide underlines these spans; this text has no underline mark): ym in kterym; aj in odpovídaj (also bold and italic); tohodle (also bold); im in dopravnim (also bold and italic).

Original slide 23 (image)

Slide 24: Slide 24

a ať vona nám řekne co tam teda chce napsat pe naše pamačka to tak vždycky dělala , to dělám jednou za rok takovoule krávovinu každej rok se tam mění kolonky a mění se takový a započitatelný a nezapočitatelný a a podle nových novel novel zákonů takže tim sem se nikdy nevzrušoval abych tohlencto se snažil vůbec pochopit protože příští rok bude jiný a já to zase budu dělat jenom jednou , tak sme to takle vyplnili natřikrát nó von to vdycky dovez vo vona mu řekla co von to zase přivez

Underline in the source slide, kept apart from the bold and italic shown above (the slide underlines these spans; this text has no underline mark): pamačka; vždycky; takovoule; krávovinu; ej in každej; ný in započitatelný and in nezapočitatelný (also bold); ých in nových; the second novel; že in takže; tim; sem; tohlencto; sme; takle; von; dovez; vo in vona; v in von; zase; přivez.

Original slide 24 (image)

Slide 25: spisovně

spisovně

Original slide 25 (image)

Slide 26: Slide 26

Awareness of the two codes is very high in the Czech speech community. Attested by the high number of occurrences of “spisovn.*” (Standard Czech) in the Oral corpus (32)

Original slide 26 (image)

Slide 27: Slide 27

maminka ho tam prostě protlačila prže tam je to všechno jenom o známosti tam nejsou vystudovaní lidi tam nejsou pravý žurnalista . dyž se na to podíváš tam fakt nikdo nemluví spisovně . každý ňáký ten debilní pražský akcent a skloňuje si to jak chce si tam vymýšlí ňáké . nové české slova

Underline in the source slide, kept apart from the bold and italic shown above (the slide underlines these spans; this text has no underline mark): i in lidi; ňá in ňáký; debilní; ňáké; é in nové and in české (also italic).

Original slide 27 (image)

Slide 28: Slide 28

ale to já třeba sem zjistila teda že hyper spisovně mluvim když se vožeru , teda když sem v takovém stádiu že teda ještě můžu mluvit …… když se opiju tak začnu mluvit spisovně , né vždycky ale často

Underline in the source slide, kept apart from the bold and italic shown above (the slide underlines these spans; this text has no underline mark): im in mluvim; vožeru (also bold on the v).

Original slide 28 (image)

Slide 29: Slide 29

Eduard_197● člověka nenapadá nic jiného než že sou za tim skutečně ekonomické zájmy a nic než ekonomické zájmy ,
Vítězslav_198● ty teda hovoříš tak spisovně teďka ,
Blažena_196● tak (nesrozumitelné) ,
Eduard_197● (nesrozumitelné) vždycky vždycky hovořím +
Vítězslav_198● ty mluvíš jako jako při rozhovoru no ,
Eduard_197● + ne já vždycky hovořím spiš* spisovně když @ mluvim mluvim takhle o něčem konkrétním ,
Blažena_196● no to souvisí i s určitejma tématama ,
Vítězslav_198● hmm je to možný no a* -

Underline in the source slide, kept apart from the bold and italic shown above (the slide underlines these spans; this text has no underline mark): im in tim; teďka; im in each of the two mluvim; ejma in určitejma (also bold); ama in tématama (also bold).

Original slide 29 (image)

Slide 30: hezky česky

hezky česky

Original slide 30 (image)

Slide 31: Slide 31

Jestliže si národ dokáže bez váhání odpovědět na klasické Gercenovo Kto vinovat ? , pak je přece jen složitější najít rozumnou odpověď na Černyševského Što dělať ? , tedy kromě Uljanovova velmi nedemokraticky zjednodušujícího Streljať . Část odpovědi nabízejí takzvaní whistlebloweři , hezky česky „ píšťalkáři “ , kteří se neváhají vzepřít zaběhlému „ modu vivendi “ a jít proti proudu tím , že ohlásí případy korupce ve svém okolí .

Underline in the source slide, kept apart from the bold and italic shown above (the slide underlines these spans; this text has no underline mark): whistlebloweři.

Original slide 31 (image)

Slide 32: Slide 32

Netvařme se , jako že je všechno v pořádku a že v této zemi všichni žijí šťastné životy . Právě na takové pokrytectví dojela – jak se hezky česky říká – většina tzv. komunistických režimů . S tím pak bezprostředně souvisí můj druhý návrh . Přestaňme se bát levicové literatury ! Levicoví , opoziční autoři nejsou v této republice – na rozdíl od disidentů normalizačních let – mocensky nijak pronásledováni .

Original slide 32 (image)

Slide 33: Slide 33

Režisérka Andrea Sedláčková režíruje Vojtěcha Dyka v roli tak trochu jiného Dannyho Smiřického . Ať žijí hudební paraziti Přiživování se na popularitě jiných , nebo tvůrčí posun nabízející nový pohled ? Coververze neboli nehezky česky "předělávky" jsou příjemným zpestřením populární hudby . Ve světě coververzí se fantazii meze nekladou . Existují country úpravy punkových Sex Pistols i překopané skladby Rolling Stones hrané na ukulele .

Underline in the source slide, kept apart from the bold and italic shown above (the slide underlines these spans; this text has no underline mark): ne in nehezky (also bold).

Original slide 33 (image)

Slide 34: Can we think of this phenomenon constructionally?

Can we think of this phenomenon constructionally?

Original slide 34 (image)

Slide 35: Slide 35

At first blush, the data does not appear have enough formal regularity to be described within the framework of construction grammar.

Original slide 35 (image)

Slide 36: Slide 36

To adopt a constructional approach is to undertake a commitment in principle to account for the entirety of each language.

— (Fillmore and Kay, 1999)

Original slide 36 (image)

Slide 37: What do constructions “look” like?

What do constructions “look” like?

Original slide 37 (image)

Slide 38: Slide 38

  • form:meaning pairing
  • organized in an inventory
  • processed through the process of blending

Original slide 38 (image)

Slide 39: Slide 39

On the semantic pole meanings are organized through frames (schemas, metaphors, rich images, scenarios, etc.).

Different levels of schematicity and knowledge of the world are required.

Original slide 39 (image)

Slide 40: What does semantic schematicity look like?

What does semantic schematicity look like?

Original slide 40 (image)

Slide 41: Slide 41

“Consider the idiom to keep someone at arm's length. I have asked hundreds of people if they have an image associated with this idiom. Almost everyone does, and it is almost always the same image.”

— (Lakoff 1987)

Original slide 41 (image)

Slide 42: Slide 42

“The arm is oriented forward with respect to the body, perhaps a little to the side. It is never oriented backward. or upward. or downward, though these are all logical possibilities.

The arm is chest high.

The hand is usually open (though some have it making a fist).

The open palm is facing away from the subject; it is never facing toward the subject.

The angle of the hand relative to the forearm is roughly 90 to 135 degrees.

The arm muscles are tense, not lax. The person being kept at arm's length is facing toward the subject.”

— (Lakoff 1987)

Original slide 42 (image)

Slide 43: At arm’s length

At arm’s length

Blurred photograph of a hand pressed against frosted glass.

Original slide 43 (image)

Slide 44: Slide 44

Screenshot of an Adobe Stock search for “at arms length” with three results: a woman holding up her palm, a man pushing a woman away at arm's length, and a man and a woman standing apart with the man's arm stretched towards her.

https://stock.adobe.com/search/images?k="at+arms+length"

Original slide 44 (image)

Slide 45: Slide 45

The slide's original page: a video frame titled “Arm Length GIF” from an anime, in which one character holds another at arm's length while she tries to reach forward.

https://giphy.com/gifs/arm-length-onimonogatari-BVqTyss6XU72U

Original slide 45 (image)

Slide 46: Slide 46

Screenshot of a blog post, “5 reasons pastors keep members at arm's length” by Mark Dance, August 16, 2017, with a sepia photograph of an outstretched arm and open hand.

https://factsandtrends.net/2017/08/16/5-reasons-pastors-keep-members-arms-length/

Original slide 46 (image)

Slide 47: Slide 47

Screenshot of an article on Migraine.com, “Keeping Friends at Arm's Length Due to Migraine” by Kerrie Smyres, October 19, 2018, with an illustration of two women talking through tin cans joined by a string.

https://migraine.com/living-migraine/keeping-friends-arms-length/

Original slide 47 (image)

Slide 48: What does a ‘formal’ schema look like?

What does a ‘formal’ schema look like?

Original slide 48 (image)

Slide 49: Slide 49

the construction grammarian is required to develop an explicit system of representation, capable of encoding economically and without loss of generalization all the constructions (or patterns) of the language, from the most idiomatic to the most general.

— (Fillmore and Kay, 1999)

Original slide 49 (image)

Slide 50: Slide 50

There is a conflict between the constructional commitment to describe the entirety of each language and the scientific notion of descriptive parsimony when expressed through formalisms and ‘machine readable’ notations.

Original slide 50 (image)

Slide 51: Jackendoff, 2019

Jackendoff, 2019

Photograph of a projected slide headed “Inflection and inflectional classes”: “A weak verb: machen (stem)” with its semantics MAKE (X, Y), morphosyntax and phonology, “2 of the 12 inflected forms” (mache and machten, with their morphosyntax and phonology) and “Schemas for 2 of the 12 inflected forms” (PRESENT 1 SG schema and PAST 3 PL schema).

Original slide 51 (image)

Slide 52: Fauconnier and Turner, 1998

Fauconnier and Turner, 1998

Black-and-white diagram of a conceptual integration network: a circle labelled “Generic Space” at the top, circles labelled “Input I1” on the left and “Input I2” on the right, and a circle labelled “Blend” at the bottom, joined by solid and dotted lines with small dots marking elements.

Original slide 52 (image)

Slide 53: What does this look like for constructional forms?

What does this look like for constructional forms?

Blurred photograph of a hand pressed against frosted glass.

Original slide 53 (image)

Slide 54: Janda (2019)

Janda (2019)

yesterday

Photograph of a projected scatter plot with Russian words, Factor 1 (53.3 %) against Factor 2 (9.7 %), with a cluster of overlapping Cyrillic labels and the labels “Masculine animates” and “pl.loc” in red.

Original slide 54 (image)

Slide 55: Slide 55

  • totiž construction
    • constructional meaning:
      • profile perceived cause in the discourse space
      • activate modal prosody of emphasis
    • constructional form: post-verb (unstressed) position
  • because construction
    • meaning:
      • profile logical cause in the discourse space
      • activate logical prosody of causation
    • form: clause-initial (stressed) position

Lukeš, 2005, Cognitive Grammar Beyond the Sentence

Original slide 55 (image)

Slide 56: Slide 56

  • Czech causal cohesive harmony construction
    • constructional meaning: profile all possible causal coherence links through connectives plus direction and/or semantic prosody of emphasis or attitude
    • constructional form: totiž, tak, proto, protože plus Czech elegant variation
  • English causal cohesive harmony construction
    • meaning: profile necessary (logical) causal coherence links through connectives plus direction and/or semantic prosody of logical inference
    • form: zero, for, because, so, therefore, thus, which is why, then plus English elegant variation

Lukeš, 2005, Cognitive Grammar Beyond the Sentence

Original slide 56 (image)

Slide 57: Slide 57

What would this look like for something complex, patterned but also somehow vague like Slavic aspect?

Fundamental event profile orientation of the generic space serving as the source for constructional blends involving verbs.

Lukeš, 2015, Czech Without Aspect

Original slide 57 (image)

Slide 58: Tak jsme došli. < Failure

Tak jsme došli. < Failure

  • [MEANING]
    • Time location: Immediate past>Present
    • Event status: Completed
    • Speaker attitude: Negative (semantic prosody)
    • Communicative intent: Announcement of failure
  • [FORM]
    • Verb form: -l marking (past prototype)
    • Verb version: completion prefix (perfective prototype)
    • Intonation/stress pattern: pattern (complaint/frustration prototype)
    • Textual context: particle inventory {tak, no tak, tak to, tak teda, no a}
    • Usage context: conversation
    • Medium: speech or simulated speech

Original slide 58 (image)

Slide 59: Slide 59

The slide's original page: a blending diagram in circles. A “Generic space” circle at the top holds three small boxed diagrams, each of a path that rises, runs level and falls, with arrows to boxed labels. The first is headed “Perfective”: arrows go to boxes O (left), P (above) and F (right), and a shaded area headed “Perfective” covers the falling end of the path and its arrow to F. The second is headed “Imperfective”: arrows go to O, P and F, and a shaded area headed “Imperfective” covers the level middle of the path and its arrow to P. The third is headed “Repetitive - Habitual” and shows three identical short paths in a row, each rising, running level and falling, with no shading and no boxed labels. A stack of overlapping input circles on the left contains the words jít, dojít and tak, each followed by F:M in square brackets (given in the list below); a stack of overlapping circles on the right holds the full meaning and form specification of the construction (the content of slide 58); and an “Integrated space” circle at the bottom contains “Tak jsme došli < Failure”.

  • Generic space
    • Perfective: path with arrows to boxes O, P and F; the shaded area covers the end of the path and the arrow to F
    • Imperfective: path with arrows to boxes O, P and F; the shaded area covers the middle of the path and the arrow to P
    • Repetitive - Habitual: three identical short paths in a row, no shading
  • Integrated space
  • Tak jsme došli < Failure
  • jít[F:M]
  • dojít[F:M]
  • tak[F:M]

Original slide 59 (image)

Slide 60: Would would this work for code switching

Would would this work for code switching

Original slide 60 (image)

Slide 61: Code switch construction in Czech

Code switch construction in Czech

  • [MEANING]
    • Schematicity: high, functions as generic space
    • Register: move from high to low and low to high
    • Speaker consciousness: indeterminate
    • Communicative intent: indeterminate
  • [FORM]
    • Morphological: activation of marking inventory
    • Lexical: choice of word register
    • Intonation/stress pattern: neutral
    • Textual context: indeterminate
    • Usage context: indeterminate
    • Medium: indeterminate

Original slide 61 (image)

Slide 62: Hypostatic code mix construction in Czech

Hypostatic code mix construction in Czech

  • [MEANING]
    • Schematicity: high, functions as generic space
    • Register: move from high to low or low to high
    • Speaker awareness: conscious effort to switch register
    • Communicative intent: stress change of perspective, direct listener/reader to interpretation
  • [FORM]
    • Morphological: activation of appropriate marking inventory
    • Lexical: choice of lexical items from contextually activated inventory
    • Intonation/stress pattern: emphasis on structure
    • Textual context: ten, podle toho, …
    • Usage context: professional conversation
    • Medium: speech

Original slide 62 (image)

Slide 63: Slide 63

The slide's original page: a blending diagram in circles. A “Generic space” circle at the top contains “Register”, “Common Czech inventory”, “Standard Czech inventory” and “Preceding text”; a stack of overlapping circles on the left contains “GEN FEM ADJ -é”, “GEN FEM ADJ –ý”, “GEN FEM ADJ –ý vs -é” and “Lexical choice”; a stack of overlapping circles on the right holds the construction specification; and an “Integrated space” circle at the bottom contains “pokud se týká té technické části”.

  • Generic space
  • Integrated space
  • pokud se týká té technické části
  • GEN FEM ADJ -é
  • GEN FEM ADJ –ý
  • GEN FEM ADJ –ý vs -é
  • Register
  • Common Czech inventory
  • Standard Czech inventory
  • Preceding text
  • Lexical choice

Original slide 63 (image)

Slide 64: Concluding thought

Concluding thought

Original slide 64 (image)

Slide 65: Slide 65

If we are to take the constructional commitment to accounting for the “entirety of each language” seriously in the usage-based linguistics paradigm, we have to find ways dealing with entire text and conversation even when they remain outside the traditional linguistic formalism.

Original slide 65 (image)

Slide 66: Slide 66

Photograph of an overhead projector in a dim room, projecting a drawing of a smiling sun onto the wall.

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA

Original slide 66 (image)

Slide 67: Thank you

Thank you

[email protected]

http://metaphorhacker.net

@techczech

Original slide 67 (image)